“Three Searches for the ‘Historical Jesus’ But No Biblical Christ: The Rise of the Searches (Part 1).” The Master’s Seminary Journal 23, no. “What Are The Odds?: The Jesus Seminar’s Quest for Objectivity.” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 13, no. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2002.Įverton, Sean F. Pocket Dictionary of Apologetics & Philosophy of Religion. “The Baptism of Jesus According to the Gospel of Mark.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 34, no. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2004.Įdwards, James R. An Introduction to the New Testament: Context, Methods, and Ministry Formation. “How Is Jesus the Son of God? Luke’s Baptism Narrative and Christology.” Calvin Theological Journal 17, no. Accessed October 2, 2021.ĭennison, Charles G. “What Marcus Borg’s Video Camera Might Have Seen If He’d Been Filming in Jerusalem in the Days Following the Death of the Jewish Peasant Jesus.” Christianity and Literature 63, no. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991.Ĭzaia, Zach. “What Did Jesus Really Say?” Bible Review 5, no. “The Historical Study of Jesus and Christian Origins.” In Jesus at 2000, edited by Marcus J. The God We Never Knew: Beyond Dogmatic Religion to A More Authentic Contemporary Faith. Meeting Jesus Again for the First Time: The Historical Jesus & the Heart of Contemporary Faith. Jesus: Uncovering the Life, Teachings, and Relevance of A Religious Revolutionary. “From Galilean Jew to the Face of God: The Pre-Easter and Post-Easter Jesus.” In Jesus at 2000, edited by Marcus J. “The Historical Jesus: Evangelical View.” In The Historical Jesus: Five Views, edited by James K. Terlepas dari pandangan Borg yang digemari di kalangan pembaca teologi modern tentang baptisan Yesus, pemikirannya masih jauh dari teologi ortodoks oleh karena terlalu berpijak pada analisis secara sosio-antropologis dan mengabaikan Alkitab sebagai wahyu dari Allah.īock, Darrell L. Tulisan ini berusaha untuk memaparkan secara khusus pandangan Borg dalam peristiwa baptisan Yesus dan menganalisis serta menanggapi pandangannya menurut perspektif injili. Mengaitkan kedua pandangan yang bertolakbelakang ini, muncul permasalahan: benarkah asumsi Borg di atas? Apakah sebenarnya yang menjadi intensi Yesus dalam peristiwa baptisan tersebut? Inilah yang menjadi fokus penelitian penulis. Hal ini sama sekali tidak mengindikasikan keilahian-Nya. Borg menyatakan bahwa baptisan Yesus sebagai sebuah kesadaran spiritual Yesus yang mendalam akan dunia roh dan kehadiran Roh Allah dalam hidup-Nya. Ini merupakan sebuah deklarasi teologis bahwa Ia adalah Allah. Baptisan Tuhan Yesus bukan hanya merujuk kepada fungsi jabatan-Nya, tapi lebih daripada itu, yaitu kepada identitas ilahi-Nya. Despite the fact that Borg’s view on Jesus’ baptism has widely garnered support from modern theological readers, his theology is still far from orthodox theology because it was too socio-anthropological based analysis and ignored the Bible as God’s revelation.Ībstrak. This writing exerted to describe particularly Borg’s view on Jesus’ baptism, analyzed and responded to his view according to evangelical perspective. Based on these two contradictory views, a problem remains to be solved: Is Borg’s assumption correct? What is actually Jesus’ true intention in His baptism? This was the focus of the research. This does not indicate His divinity at all. Borg asserted that Jesus’ baptism was Jesus’ deep spiritual awareness toward spiritual world and the presence of God’s Spirit in His life. This is a theological declaration that He is God. Jesus’ baptism does not only refer to His divine role, but moreover to His divine identity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |